Activity

f 419 patients aged 0 to 14 years diagnosed and treated for ALL between 2011 and 2015 were enrolled.Patients with a blast count ≥0.1 × 109/L on day 8 exhibited significantly lower survival rates than that in those with blast counts less then 0.1 × 109/L. The EFS and OS in patients with platelet count ≥100 × 109/L on day 33 were significantly higher than those with platelet counts less then 100 × 109/L. In univariate and multivariate analyses, patients with low blast count on day 8 and high platelet count on day 33 were significantly associated with better EFS and OS. The combination of blast cell count on day 8 and platelet count on day 33 demonstrated a strong association with MRD-based risk stratification.Complete blood count is an inexpensive, easy to perform, and reliable measurement in children with ALL. The combination of blast count and platelet count during and after induction chemotherapy was a significant and independent prognostic factor for treatment outcome in pediatric ALL.

In this analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of dual therapy (DT) with a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and an adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor) vs triple therapy (TT) with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor and a vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with co-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), http//www.ClinicalTrials.gov, Excerpta Medical data BASE (EMBASE), Web of Science, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar were the searched databases. Studies that were randomized trials or observational studies comparing DT vs TT for the treatment of DM patients with co-existing AF following PCI were included in this analysis. The adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding events were the endpoints. This meta-analysis was carried out by the RevMan version 5.4 software. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) wding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90; P = .008) were significantly higher with TT.

DT with a NOAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with significantly less bleeding events without increasing the adverse cardiovascular outcomes when compared to TT with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor and a Vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of DM patients with co-existing AF following PCI. Hence, DT is comparable in efficacy, but safer compared to TT. This interesting hypothesis will have to be confirmed in future studies.

DT with a NOAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor was associated with significantly less bleeding events without increasing the adverse cardiovascular outcomes when compared to TT with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor and a Vitamin K antagonist for the treatment of DM patients with co-existing AF following PCI. Hence, DT is comparable in efficacy, but safer compared to TT. This interesting hypothesis will have to be confirmed in future studies.

Although there are many studies showing potential benefit in aortic stenosis (AS) patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), but these studies are subject to significant selection and other biases, making the results challenging to interpret. Furthermore, the evidence on the use of ACEI in AS patients has not been reviewed systematically; we thus conducted this protocol assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of ACEI for patients with AS.

The following search terms will be used in PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases on May, 2021, as the search algorithm (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) OR (ACEI) AND (aortic stenosis) OR (AS). Two searchers will independently draft and carry out the search strategy, and the third member will further complete it. The studies on cohort study focusing on assessing the efficacy of ACEI on AS patients will be included in our meta-analysis. At least one of the following outcomes should have been measured left ventricular mass, exercise tolerance, B-type natriuretic peptide, adverse event, functional outcomes, and aortic valve area. All outcomes are pooled on random-effect model. A P value of <.05 is considered to be statistically significant.

The results of this research will be delivered in a peer-reviewed journal.

Depending on the previous studies, we assumed that ACEI could possibly improve the clinical symptoms and outcomes of symptomatic AS.

10.17605/OSF.IO/G9KPT.

10.17605/OSF.IO/G9KPT.

As the adjunctive anesthesia to propofol, both dezocine and fentanyl showed some potential for gastrointestinal endoscopy. this website This meta-analysis aimed to compare their efficacy and safety.

PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dezocine versus fentanyl for the anesthesia of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy were included.

Five RCTs involving 677 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with fentanyl plus propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy, dezocine plus propofol resulted in the reduction in propofol dose(mean difference [MD] = -11.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -22.83 to -0.61; P = .04), awakening time (std. MD = -1.79; 95% CI = -3.31 to -0.27; P = .02) and hypopnea (risk ratio [RR] = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.06-0.41; P = .0002), but had no remarkable effect on induction time (MD = 1.20; 95% CI = -0.98 to 3.39; P = .28), postoperative pain score (MD = -0.38; 95% CI = -1.00 to 0.24; P = .24), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.10-1.98; P = .29).

Dezocine plus propofol may be better for the anesthesia of gastrointestinal endoscopy than fentanyl plus propofol.

Dezocine plus propofol may be better for the anesthesia of gastrointestinal endoscopy than fentanyl plus propofol.

The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the relationships between ATP2B1 gene polymorphisms with blood pressure (BP) level and susceptibility to hypertension.

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) Databases were systematically searched by 2 independent researchers to screen studies on ATP2B1 gene polymorphisms and BP related phenotypes. The records retrieval period was limited from the formation of the database to March 4, 2021. Pooled odds rations (ORs) or β and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated to assess the association between ATP2B1 gene polymorphisms and the risk of hypertension or BP levels. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were conducted to find potential bias. All the statistical analysis were conducted with Stata version 11.0 software.

A total of 15 articles were ultimately included in the present study, including 15 polymorphisms of ATP2B1 gene. Nine articles (N = 65,362) reported the polymorphism rs17249754, and 7 articles(N = 91,997) reported rs2681472 (both loci were reported in 1 article).