-
Blum posted an update 10 months, 2 weeks ago
This investigation aimed at creating automated, computable phenotypes for acute brain dysfunction states and documenting transitions between such states, thereby portraying the clinical trajectories of ICU patients. Two distinct longitudinal EHR datasets, concentrated on single-center data, were created for the 48,817 adult ICU patients at UFH Gainesville (GNV) and Jacksonville (JAX). Using a k-means clustering approach in conjunction with continuous measurements of acute brain dysfunction, we developed algorithms to categorize the status of acute brain dysfunction, including coma, delirium, normal, or death, every 12 hours during each admission to the intensive care unit. These algorithms were also used to identify specific types of acute brain dysfunction. The UFH GNV dataset recorded 49,770 admissions for 37,835 patients, while the UFH JAX dataset had 18,472 admissions for 10,982 patients. The worst brain dysfunction in 18% of patients was coma; every 12 hours, around 4% to 7% transitioned to delirium, 22% to 25% recovered, 3% to 4% expired, and 67% to 68% remained in a coma in the ICU. Besides, 7 percent of patients had delirium as the worst brain dysfunction; around 6% to 7% developed coma, 40% to 42% showed no delirium, 1% died, and 51% to 52% remained delirious within the intensive care unit. Among patients admitted to the ICU, three phenotypic presentations were prevalent: persistent coma/delirium, unchanging normal status, and a transition from coma/delirium to normal, mostly occurring within the first 48 hours. To determine acute brain dysfunction status every 12 hours, we devised phenotyping scoring algorithms for ICU patients. This approach could be a valuable component in developing prognostic and decision-support tools designed to guide patient and clinician discussions about resource utilization and care escalation.
The application of artificial intelligence to nuclear medicine has sparked substantial enthusiasm. Employing deep-learning (DL) techniques to eliminate noise from images acquired with lower-dose radiation, reduced scan times, or both, has become a focus of significant research. Clinical adoption of these approaches hinges on the objective evaluation of their effectiveness. Evaluation of DL-based methods for denoising nuclear-medicine images commonly employs fidelity metrics like RMSE and SSIM. However, the collection of these images is for medical use cases, and therefore, their assessment should be determined by their performance in such clinical applications. Our primary objectives included (1) verifying the consistency of evaluation employing these FoMs against objective clinical task evaluations; (2) providing a theoretical evaluation of how denoising affects signal detection tasks; and (3) demonstrating the utility of virtual clinical trials (VCTs) in assessing deep learning methods. To assess a deep learning technique for reducing noise in myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) images, a validation cohort study was performed. The impact of DL-based denoising on the detection of perfusion defects in Magnetic Perfusion Spectroscopy (MPS) images, as ascertained by a model observer with anthropomorphic channels, was quantified through fidelity-based Figures of Merit (FoMs) and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Using fidelity-based performance metrics, the deep learning denoising method proved considerably more effective. While ROC analysis was conducted, denoising did not result in any improvements to detection performance, and, surprisingly, often caused a deterioration. The results highlight the importance of objective, task-oriented evaluations for DL-based denoising methods. This study goes on to demonstrate how VCTs offer a process to execute these evaluations with the assistance of VCTs. Brigimadlin The denoising approach’s limited effectiveness is elucidated by our theoretical treatment, offering crucial insights.
Multistate models will be utilized to determine the longitudinal course of acute kidney injury (AKI), characterize the transitions through worsening and recovery stages, and assess patient outcomes among hospitalized individuals.
Between 2012 and 2019, a longitudinal study of 138,449 adult patients admitted to a quaternary care hospital tracked their staging based on Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes serum creatinine criteria for the first 14 days. We model the likelihood of being in particular clinical states at a specific time after entering each stage of acute kidney injury (AKI) using multistate models. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to explore the influence of selected variables on transition rates.
Hospitalizations (246964 cases) revealed a prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in 20% (49325 cases). Within this group, AKI severity was distributed as: 66% of the cases falling into Stage 1, 18% into Stage 2, and 17% into Stage 3, possibly requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). At the seven-day mark following Stage 1 AKI, 69% (95% CI 688%-705%) of patients had either fully recovered or been discharged. In contrast, recovery (268%, 95% CI 261%-275%) and discharge (174%, 95% CI 168%-180%) rates were notably lower for Stage 2 AKI.
Multistate data demonstrated that most Stage 2 and higher severity AKI cases did not resolve within the seven-day timeframe; accordingly, strategies that curb the progression or recurrence of AKI are essential to enhance the quality of life experienced by these patients.
Using a multistate modeling framework, we evaluate its value in understanding the clinical progression of acute kidney injury, with the potential for improving treatment and resource management strategies.
The utility of a multi-state modeling framework in understanding the clinical course of AKI is demonstrated, with implications for optimizing treatment approaches and resource planning.
Synthetic polymers and proteins exhibit the well-known phenomenon of phase separation, which has become a major area of investigation in biophysics because of its proposed role in creating compartments within cells, without needing membranes. Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), or their structureless counterparts, make up a substantial part of the coacervates (or condensates), often collaborating with RNA and DNA. The 526-residue RNA-binding protein, Fused In Sarcoma (FUS), is a captivating example of an internally displaced person (IDP) whose monomer conformations and condensates display behavior that is strikingly sensitive to the parameters of the surrounding solution. By focusing chiefly on the N-terminus low complexity domain (FUS-LC, consisting of residues 1-214) and related truncations, we offer a rationale for the results of solid-state NMR experiments, indicating that FUS-LC adopts a non-polymorphic fibril (core-1) comprising residues 39-95, enveloped by fuzzy coats at both the N-terminal and C-terminal extremities. An alternative configuration (core-2), with free energy akin to core-1, materializes solely within the truncated sequence (residues 110-214). The stabilization of core-1 and core-2 fibrils is achieved through both a Tyrosine ladder and hydrophilic interactions. FUS’s adopted morphologies (gels, fibrils, and glass-like behavior) appear to exhibit substantial variation contingent upon the experimental setup. The phosphorylated sites’ location dictates the specific consequences for fibril stability. The unusual features of FUS may also be present in other intrinsically disordered proteins, including TDP43 and hnRNPA2, indicating a potential overlap in characteristics. A catalogue of issues with a lack of clarity in their molecular understanding is outlined by us.
Scientific advancement, especially in artificial intelligence (AI), is effectively tracked and its translation into practice is improved with the use of key validation metrics, which bridge the chasm between the two. However, increasing empirical data reveals that in image analysis, metrics are often selected in a way that fails to adequately address the underlying research problem. A key factor in this phenomenon may be the lack of accessible knowledge regarding metrics. While recognizing the individual characteristics of validation metrics, including their strengths, weaknesses, and limitations, is indispensable for prudent decisions, the necessary knowledge base remains fragmented and poorly accessible. Developed from a multi-stage Delphi process coordinated by a multidisciplinary team of experts, and further refined by substantial community engagement, this study presents the first trustworthy and detailed unified access point to challenges in validation metrics encountered in image analysis. Central to this work is biomedical image analysis, yet the implications extend across diverse fields; the revealed weaknesses, universally applicable across all application domains, are organized within a newly developed, field-independent taxonomy. To aid understanding, each stumbling block is accompanied by visuals and concrete instances. This structured body of information, readily available to researchers of all skill sets, refines the global understanding of this important topic in image analysis validation.
By incorporating digital imaging, microscopy has progressed from primarily a visual tool for observing life at the micro- and nano-level to a quantitative instrument characterized by continually increasing resolution and efficiency. A pivotal role in microscopy-based research, over the last decade, has been assumed by computational methods such as artificial intelligence, deep neural networks, and machine learning, which are niche terms. Authored collaboratively by prominent researchers, this roadmap encompasses specific applications of machine learning for microscopy image data analysis. The central objective is to strengthen scientific comprehension through improved image resolution, automated detection, segmentation, classification, tracking of microscopic objects, and a refined integration of data obtained from multiple imaging procedures. The focus of this piece is to give the reader a general overview of the key advancements and a clear insight into the possibilities and limitations of employing machine learning in microscopy.