Activity

Medical management based on palliative chemotherapy is currently the standard of care in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Median survival of 12-16 months has been reported with modern chemotherapy regimens with or without anti-angiogenic agents. Multimodality therapy incorporating cytoreductive surgery, systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been offered for years to fit patients with early-stage disease, but its role remains debated. Our objective was to compare overall survival in patients offered multimodality therapy in a specialized clinic setting in London, UK to that of patients offered exclusively medical treatment at another academic institution in Quebec, Canada.

We retrospectively compared the survival rates of 2 separate cohorts of patients treated consecutively Cohort 1 (n = 106) received multimodality therapy including systemic chemotherapy, extended pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) and prophylactic radiotherapy in London (United Kingdom) between 2009 and 2016, while Cohort 2 (n = 98) received medical treatment at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute (Canada) during the same period.

In Cohort 1, all patients but two completed trimodality therapy. In cohort 2, 51 % received palliative care only and 40 % received systemic chemotherapy. Median survival was 32 months vs 10 months in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively (hazard ratio with age, gender, pathology and TNM staging as covariates 3.81; 95 % CI 2.67-5.45; p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained in sensitivity analyses, after excluding those who received best supportive care only and in a propensity score-matched analysis.

Aggressive therapy of MPM using cancer-directed surgery, systemic chemotherapy and prophylactic radiotherapy may provide a significant survival benefit in selected patients.

Aggressive therapy of MPM using cancer-directed surgery, systemic chemotherapy and prophylactic radiotherapy may provide a significant survival benefit in selected patients.

This study aimed to analyze the effect of bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy (BML) on survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The hypothesis was BML offers survival benefit as compared with SLND.

A randomized clinical trial including stage I-IIIA NSCLC patients was performed. All patients underwent anatomical lung resection. BML was performed during the same operation via additional cervical incision (BML group). In the control group, standard lymphadenectomy (systematic lymph node dissection, SLND) was performed.

In total, 102 patients were randomized. No significant difference was found in the type of lung resection, blood loss, chest tube output, air leak, pain, and complications (p = 0.188-0.959). In the BML group, the operative time was longer (318 vs 223 min, p < 0.001) with higher number of removed N2 nodes (24 vs 14, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was 72 % in the BML group vs 53 % in the SLND group (OR 2.33, 95 % CI 0.95-5.69, p = 0.062). Separate comparisons for different lobar locations of the tumor have shown no significant difference in survival for the right lung tumors and left upper lobe tumors. For the left lower lobe tumors, survival time was longer in the BML group (p = 0.021), and the 5-year survival rate was 90.9 % vs 37.5 %, (OR 16.66, 95 % CI 1.36-204.04, p = 0.0277).

In patients with NSCLC located in the left lower lobe, bilateral lymph node dissection may be associated with better survival. The invasiveness of BML is comparable to that of SLND.

In patients with NSCLC located in the left lower lobe, bilateral lymph node dissection may be associated with better survival. CH-223191 molecular weight The invasiveness of BML is comparable to that of SLND.

Mepolizumab is a human monoclonal antibody against interleukin 5 (IL-5) used to treat severe eosinophilic asthma. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of mepolizumab in the real world. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in the context of heterogeneity among patients, clinicians, and treatment regimens to study the effectiveness of mepolizumab in the real world.

We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for real-world studies on severe asthma treatment with mepolizumab as of June 30, 2020. Exacerbations, asthma-related hospitalizations, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV

), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) or Asthma Control Test (ACT), corticosteroid use, peripheral blood eosinophil counts, and the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide were selected as indicators to evaluate the effectiveness. Standardized mean differences by the Cohen method and mean differences were chosen as indicators of effect size. Cohen d values of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 are considered as small, medium,

Our study suggests that mepolizumab is associated with improvements in several clinically meaningful real-world outcomes. This study is a supplement to and extension of the efficacy of randomized controlled trials of mepolizumab. (Clin Ther. 2021;XXXXX-XXX) © 2021 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Our study suggests that mepolizumab is associated with improvements in several clinically meaningful real-world outcomes. This study is a supplement to and extension of the efficacy of randomized controlled trials of mepolizumab. (Clin Ther. 2021;XXXXX-XXX) © 2021 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Roxadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, treats anemia in chronic kidney disease. Hyperphosphatemia, a common complication in chronic kidney disease, is treated with phosphate binders (PBs). This study in healthy individuals investigated the effect of 2 PBs, sevelamer carbonate and calcium acetate, on the pharmacokinetic properties of a single oral dose of roxadustat administered concomitantly or with a time lag.

This 2-part, Phase I study was conducted with an open-label, randomized, 3-way (part 1) or 5-way (part 2) crossover design, with 5-day treatment periods. On day 1 of each period, participants received 200 mg roxadustat administered alone or (1) concomitantly with sevelamer carbonate (2400 mg) or calcium acetate (1900 mg) (part 1) or (2) 1 hour before or 1, 2, or 3 hours after sevelamer carbonate (part 2A) or calcium acetate (part 2B); 5 additional PB doses were administered during 2 days. In both parts, PBs were administered with meals. Primary pharmacokinetic variables were AUC

and C

FINDINGS Twenty-four individuals were randomized in part 1; 60 individuals were randomized in part 2 (part 2A, n=30; part 2B, n=30).