-
Lynggaard posted an update 9 months ago
V infection in commercial pheasant stocks.
Traditionally, the diagnosis of preeclampsia requires elevated blood pressure measurements and proteinuria demonstrated in a 24-hour urine collection. This prolonged urine collection is associated with patient discomfort, a delay in diagnosis, and in some cases, hospitalization for further management of outcomes.
We aimed to assess the feasibility, reliability, and association between maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies managed according to a 6-hour vs 24-hour urine protein collection for suspected preeclampsia.
This was a randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary university hospital between January 2019 and January 2021 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03724786). Patients who were hospitalized for preeclampsia workup were asked to participate and randomized at a 11 ratio to 6- and 24-hour urine protein collection groups. Both groups collected urine for 24 hours, during which the collection was also tested after 6-hours. After 24 hours, both results were reviewed by one of the reseanificant difference was demonstrated in the rate of adverse neonatal outcomes, cesarean delivery, induction of labor, gestational age at delivery, betamethasone treatment, or neonatal birthweight.
Managing pregnancies suspected of preeclampsia with a 6-hour urine protein collection is feasible and associated with similar maternal and neonatal outcomes. In cases where the 6-hour result is in the 168 to 475 mg range, we propose completing a 24-hour collection.
Managing pregnancies suspected of preeclampsia with a 6-hour urine protein collection is feasible and associated with similar maternal and neonatal outcomes. In cases where the 6-hour result is in the 168 to 475 mg range, we propose completing a 24-hour collection.Chronic pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide and its prevalence is likely to increase over the next decades. Treatment for chronic pain remains insufficient and therapeutical advances have not made comparable progress with that for many chronic disorders, thus amplifying the concern on the future burden of the disease. At the same time, and even after decades of intense research, the underlying pathophysiology of chronic pain remains minimally understood. We believe advancing our current understanding of chronic pain requires mechanistically explicit, hypothesis-driven, and clinically focused models. In this review we highlight some of the main findings over the last decades that have contributed to the present knowledge of brain mechanisms of chronic pain, and how such advances were possible due to a reverse translational research approach. We argue that this approach is essential in the chronic pain field, in order to generate new scientific hypotheses, probe physiological mechanisms, develop therapeutic strategies and translate findings back into promising human clinical trials.There is currently no clear understanding on the pathways involved in the process of cell inhibition by photobiomodulation (PBM). The present study evaluated the influence of PBM on the expression of autophagy markers in vitro in an in situ model of oral carcinoma. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (Cal27) and stromal fibroblasts (FG) cultures were used. The independent variables were ‘cell type’ (FG and CAL27) ‘culture condition’ (monocultures or co-cultures) and PBM (placebo and 36 J/cm2). The cultures were irradiated from a red LED source for mRNA expression and protein expression analyses. The autophagy markers evaluated were Beclin-1, LC3B and p62 as well as adjuvant markers (BAX Bcl-2, VEGF, CD105, CD34, PRDX1, PRDX4 and GRP78). The Cal27 cells upregulated the autophagy markers upon exposure to PBM both at the mRNA and protein expression levels, providing evidence to explain malignant cell inhibition by PBM.
Ileal bile acid transporter inhibition is a novel therapeutic concept for cholestatic pruritus and cholestatic liver disease progression. Odevixibat, a potent, selective, reversible ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, decreases enteric bile acid reuptake with minimal systemic exposure. Oral odevixibat safety, tolerability, and efficacy in pediatric patients with cholestatic liver disease and pruritus were evaluated.
In this phase 2, open-label, multicenter study, children received 10‒200μg/kg oral odevixibat daily for 4 weeks. Changes in serum bile acid levels (primary efficacy endpoint), pruritus, and sleep disturbance were explored.
Twenty patients were enrolled (8 females; 1‒17 years; 4 re-entered at a different dose). Estradiol Benzoate Diagnoses included progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (n=13; 3 re-entries), Alagille syndrome (n=6), biliary atresia (n=3), and other intrahepatic cholestasis causes (n=2; 1 re-entry). Mean baseline serum bile acid levels were high (235µmol/L; range, 26‒564) and were reduced in the majority (-123.1 μmol/L; range, -394 to 14.5, reflecting reductions of up to 98%). Patient-reported diary data documented improved pruritus (3 scales) and sleep. With 100μg/kg, mean (SEM) decrease was 2.8 (1.1) points for pruritus (visual analogue itch scale 0-10) and 2.9 (0.9) points for sleep disturbance (Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis scale 0-10). Reduced pruritus correlated significantly with reduced serum bile acids (P≤0.007). Significant correlations were also observed between autotaxin levels and pruritus. All patients completed the study. No serious adverse events were treatment related; most adverse events, including increased transaminases, were transient.
Orally administered odevixibat was well tolerated, reduced serum bile acids, and improved pruritus and sleep disturbance in children with cholestatic diseases.
Orally administered odevixibat was well tolerated, reduced serum bile acids, and improved pruritus and sleep disturbance in children with cholestatic diseases.
Recently, the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is considered to be associated with outcomes in multiple solid tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We sought to determine whether LIPI has the same predictive effect in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
The clinical data of a real-world, retrospective cohort of AGC patients treated with ICIs were retrospectively analyzed. Based on pre-treatment dNLR>3 and LDH>250U/L, patients were assigned to one of three groups good (0 factors), intermediate (1 factor), and poor (2 factors). The subjects were divided into two groups LIPI-good and LIPI-intermediate/poor groups. Then, the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between these two groups.
Finally, 120 patients were enrolled in the study, for both the good group and intermediate/poor group, DCR was 69.5% vs. 42.1% (P=0.004). In a multivariate analysis, the LIPI-intermediate/poor group was associated with progressive disease, with an OR of 2.