Activity

Introduction Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) is the current standard of treatment after breast conservative surgery (BCS). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) must be associated to WBI in patients showing high-risk factors of local recurrence in the definitive pathology report. The aim of this trial was to evaluate, for the first time, the acute toxicity and cosmesis of HWBI after photon-IORT. Materials and methods Twenty-six luminal breast cancer patients treated by BCS and IORT(20 Gy) were included between February and December 2019, in this prospective trial, of adjuvant HWBI (40.5 Gy/2.67 Gy/15 fractions). Acute toxicity (CTCAEv5.0) and cosmesis (Harvard scale), were assessed 3 months after treatment. Results All patients completed their treatment without interruptions. All cases were evaluable 3 months after treatment showing no toxicity ≥ G3 and excellent/good cosmesis assessment in 88% of the patients. Conclusion HWBI seems to have similar acute toxicity and cosmesis results than conventionally fractionated WBI in combination to photon-IORT after BCS.Hepatocholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) is a rare malignancy containing features of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (MFCCC), of which the outcome after hepatectomy remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with transitional HCC-CC and compare them with those of patients with HCC and MFCCC. Our prospectively maintained database was queried, and 14 transitional HCC-CC patients were identified over a total of 406 consecutive hepatic resections. A 111 match was performed with HCC and MFCCC patients operated in the same period. Apcin A total of 42 patients were matched according to tumor stage (T1-2-3, N0, M0), number of tumors, R0 resection, no 90-day mortality, and follow-up. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Disease-free survival rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 71.4%, 57.1%, 35.7% for transitional HCC-CC patients; 85.7%, 40.4%, 10.1% for HCC patients; 85.1%, 34.0%, 22.7% for MFCCC patients (5-year DFS HCC-CC vs. HCC, p = 0.575; HCC-CC vs. MFCCC, p = 0.766, respectively). Similarly, OS rates at 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 92.9%, 71.4%, 64.3% for transitional HCC-CC patients; 100%, 64.3%, 41.7% for HCC patients; 100%, 54.5%, 43.6% for MFCCC patients (5-year OS HCC-CC vs. HCC, p = 0.891; HCC-CC vs. MFCCC, p = 0.673, respectively). When accurately matched with respect to tumor burden, transitional HCC-CC patients show similar outcomes to those of HCC and MFCCC patients. Further evaluations of differences in tumor biology are necessary to better characterize the prognosis of transitional HCC-CC patients.Purpose In the current COVID-19 pandemic, it is more important than ever to maximize communication in the scientific and medical community. In the context of academic meetings and conferences, there is the growing need for a set of guidelines secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the growing environmental and economic challenges that large academic and medical conferences face. These Virtual Meetings Best Practices were established in response to the scant evidence and guidance on the topic. Methods These best practice guidelines were developed from a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, grey literature and lay literature. MEDLINE and Embase databases were scoped for relevant, non-duplicate articles. For lay articles, Google searches were utilized. The recommendations that comprise this document are a compilation of nonexperimental descriptive studies (e.g. case studies) and expert committee reports, opinions and/or experience of respected authorities, and lay articles. Results We identified four phaelines will aid events being converted and scheduled as virtual-only meetings. As we move forward in the era of increased utility and utilization of virtual conferencing, these guidelines will serve as a benchmark and standard for surgeons in the field.Purpose The review aims to provide a summary of the current literature regarding common medications prescribed in orthopaedic surgery and their potential implications in COVID-19 patients. Methods A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. All clinical studies, reviews, consensus and guidelines related to the above medications and COVID-19 were included. Results A total of 18 articles were included. The use of analgesia, anti-inflammatories, steroids, anticoagulants, antibiotics, vitamin B, vitamin C and vitamin D and their potential impact on COVID-19 patients were reported. Conclusion Eight main recommendations were derived from the review. Firstly, paracetamol remains the first line of analgesia and antipyretic. Secondly, there is no need to avoid NSAIDs for COVID-19 patients. Thirdly, opioids have the potential for immunosuppression in addition to respiratory depression and, therefore, should be prescribed with care in COVID-19 patients. Fourthly, patients with conditions where steroids are proven to be efficacious can continue to receive their steroids; otherwise, systemic steroids are not recommended for COVID-19 patients. Fifthly, orthopaedic surgeons following up on COVID-19 patients who are using steroids should continue to follow them up for possible avascular necrosis. Sixthly, whenever possible, oral anticoagulation should be converted to parental heparin. Seventhly, common orthopaedic antibiotics including penicillin and clindamycin are safe to continue for COVID-19 patients. However, for COVID-19 patients, the antibiotics can potentially be switched to macrolides and tetracyclines if the organisms are sensitive. Lastly, prescription for vitamins B, C and D should continue as per usual clinical practice.Objective To explore the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in varied subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with assessment of their clinical behavior at diagnosis and follow-up. Methods We conducted a retrospective monocentric study, including all patients operated in the Academic Hospital of Angers (France) for a pituitary neuroendocrine tumor between 2012 and 2018. PDL-1 immunostaining was performed using a European Conformity-In Vitro Diagnostic-labeled anti-PDL1 antibody (clone 22C3). PD-L1 immunostaining was evaluated as the percentage of tumor cells showing positive membrane staining, into four grades grade 0 = less then 1%, grade 1 = 1 to 5%, grade 2 = 6 to 49% and grade 3 = ≥ 50%. PD-L1 expression was compared with tumor features (secretion, proliferation, invasion) and outcome. Results The study included 139 pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, including 84 (60%) nonfunctioning adenomas. Twenty-five pituitary neuroendocrine tumors were PD-L1 positive (18%), including 3 grade 3, 8 grade 2 and 14 grade 1.